Login

HARBIY GURUHLARDA JAMOAVIY BIRLIK VA UNING JANGOVAR SAMARADORLIKKA TA'SIRI

Qambarov Sardor Baxtiyor o'g'li
Published July 12, 2026
Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Global Scientific Innovations
Pages 41-48
Open Access

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada harbiy guruhlarda jamoaviy birlik (kogeziya) hodisasining ijtimoiy-psixologik mohiyati, uning tarkibiy komponentlari hamda jangovar samaradorlik bilan bog'liqligi nazariy jihatdan tahlil qilindi. Harbiy jamoa a'zolarining bir-biriga o'zaro ishonchi, hissiy yaqinligi va vazifani birgalikda bajarishga qaratilgan intilishi jangovar vaziyatlarda askarning xatti-harakatini belgilovchi eng muhim omillardan biri sifatida ko'rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqot davomida ilmiy adabiyotlarni tahlil qilish, tizimli yondashuv va qiyosiy tahlil metodlaridan foydalanildi. Natijalar shuni ko'rsatdiki, jamoaviy birlik ikki asosiy — birlamchi (o'zaro shaxslararo) va ikkilamchi (institutsional) — darajada namoyon bo'ladi hamda uning yuqori darajasi jangovar intizom, stressga chidamlilik va vazifani bajarish sifatini oshiradi. Tadqiqot natijalari harbiy ta'lim va tayyorgarlik tizimida jamoaviy birlikni mustahkamlash bo'yicha amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab chiqishga xizmat qiladi.

Keywords: harbiy guruh, jamoaviy birlik, kogeziya, ijtimoiy psixologiya, jangovar samaradorlik, o'zaro ishonch, birlamchi guruh, komandirlik, jangovar motivatsiya.

Maqolani onlayn o'qish

140% Yuklanmoqda...
Maqola matni yuklanmoqda, iltimos kuting...

References

  • 1. G'oziyev E.G'. Umumiy psixologiya. – Toshkent: O'zbekiston faylasuflari milliy jamiyati. – 542 b.
  • 2. Stouffer S.A., Lumsdaine A.A., Lumsdaine M.H., Williams R.M., Smith M.B., Janis I.L., Star S.A., Cottrell L.S. The American Soldier: Combat and Its Aftermath. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949.
  • 3. Shils E.A., Janowitz M. Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II // Public Opinion Quarterly. – 1948. – Vol. 12, № 2. – P. 280–315.
  • 4. Marshall S.L.A. Men Against Fire: The Problem of Battle Command. – Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2000 (1-nashr 1947).
  • 5. Tuckman B.W. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups // Psychological Bulletin. – 1965. – Vol. 63, № 6. – P. 384–399.
  • 6. Griffith J.E. The Measurement of Group Cohesion in U.S. Army Units // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. – 1988. – Vol. 9, № 2. – P. 149–171.
  • 7. Siebold G.L. The Essence of Military Group Cohesion // Armed Forces & Society. – 2007. – Vol. 33, № 2. – P. 286–295.
  • 8. Siebold G.L. Key Questions and Challenges to the Standard Model of Military Group Cohesion // Armed Forces & Society. – 2011. – Vol. 37, № 3. – P. 448–468.
  • 9. King A. The Word of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military // Armed Forces & Society. – 2006. – Vol. 32, № 4. – P. 493–512.
  • 10. MacCoun R.J., Kier E., Belkin A. Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat? An Old Question with an Old Answer // Armed Forces & Society. – 2006. – Vol. 32, № 4. – P. 646–654.
  • 11. MacCoun R.J., Hix W.M. Unit Cohesion and Military Performance // Sexual Orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy: An Update of RAND's 1993 Study. – Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2010. – 5-bob.
  • 12. Wong L., Kolditz T.A., Millen R.A., Potter T.M. Why They Fight: Combat Motivation in the Iraq War. – Carlisle: U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, 2003.